Last July, the magazine People released a report indicating that in recent months prince harry He tried to contact his father. King Charles III, to request its intervention before the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC), which would give him and his family special security when traveling to the United Kingdom.
Let us remember that desperately, the duke of sussex has expressed his concern about the risk that his wife, Meghan Markle, and his children, Lilibet and Archie, could be running due to the impossibility of receiving protection in England, so even He offered to personally cover the cost of the security forces. However, this offer was denied by RAVEC.
“It is still dangerous,” explained the prince harry about his concerns for his safety earlier this year, as part of the documentary, ‘Tabloids on Trial.’ “And all it takes is one lone actor, one person who reads these things and acts on them. Whether it’s a knife or acid, whatever, and these are things that genuinely worry me. It is one of the reasons why I will not bring my wife back to this country,” said the duke.
On the other hand, while the youngest son of King Charles III is denied special security service by RAVEC for having renounced his royal duties, Popular singer Taylor Swift has been shielded to an extraordinary level during his most recent visits to London, that is why the press began to establish a relationship between the Duke of Sussex and the singer.
Why has Taylor Swift been extremely protected by RAVEC during her recent visits to London?
As reported from Newsweekin August, Swift received extreme police protection and was provided by RAVEC a body of escorts who accompanied her between her hotel and the Wembley concert venue. This measure would have been taken after terrorist threats that forced the singer to cancel her shows in Vienna.
The commentators of the aforementioned medium affirm that That level of protection is usually reserved for members of the Royal Family.ly political figures, which is why they have denounced the “double standard” between the cases of Swift and Prince Harry.
“I would say there is a double standard,” explained political and royal commentator Shola Mos-Shogbamimu to Newsweek . “Why did they let her go from one place to another without police protection, knowing perfectly well that there were terrorist alerts? And the same can be said of Prince Harry,” he added.
She continued: “The same reasons that exist to provide protection are the same reasons that exist to provide protection to Prince Harry, especially since his reasons are long-standing.
“The threats, the death threats – and I would call it domestic terrorism that he and his family face – are real, so “It makes sense that he receives police protection,” concluded the expert.
